Skip to content

SIDE BY SIDE · FACTS ONLY

JupiterOne vs Lansweeper: asset inventory facts side by side

SHORT ANSWER

JupiterOne describes 2 of the five approaches on the pages we read and Lansweeper describes 3; they differ on CAASM aggregation, Agent-based inventory, CMDB-centred inventory and Exposure management. On collection, JupiterOne works without new agents and Lansweeper offers its own agent and also works without one. Many estates run two of these approaches together, so the question is often which pair, not which one; we do not score either.

By The Inventory Desk · CAASM Finder · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

How do their approaches compare?

JupiterOne: described for 1 of 5 approaches, with a condition for 1.CAASMConnectdescribedconditionAGENTCollectnot in sourcesdescribedEASMOutside-innot in sourcesnot in sourcesCMDBRecordnot in sourcesconditionEXPOPrioritiseconditionnot in sources
  • Top bar: JupiterOne
  • Lower bar, lighter: Lansweeper
  • Full bar: described on the vendor's pages we read
  • Hatched bar: described with a condition (another product, a higher tier, or part of the approach)
  • Stub: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
The bars show what each vendor's own pages describe, or how your answers weigh the five approaches. They are not a measure of how well a product works.

What are the facts, side by side?

From each vendor's own pages. Differs marks rows where the recorded status or check value differs.
FactJupiterOneLansweeper
Positioning

A cyber asset platform built on a security graph: more than 200 integrations feed assets and their relationships into a graph you can query in plain English or with a pre-built query library.

An IT asset discovery and inventory product with three systems for the three places Lansweeper says assets live: the network including OT, off-network laptops, and cloud.

Deployment

SaaS with API integrations; useful coverage depends on how many integrations a team configures.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Agentless scanning with passive detection on by default, an optional IT agent for remote laptops, and a traffic sensor.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

CAASM aggregationDiffersDescribed

200+ pre-built integrations feed a security graph of devices, users, networks, applications, data, code repositories, security controls and owners.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

With a condition

Its own discovery does most of the work; shown integrations include ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk and Armis, and duplicates merge on MAC address, serial number and hostname.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Agent-based inventoryDiffersNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Described

Agentless scanning and passive detection by default, plus an optional IT agent for laptops that rarely touch the network.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

External attack surface managementNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

CMDB-centred inventoryDiffersNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

With a condition

Feeds ITSM and CMDB tools such as ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, HaloITSM, Freshservice and TOPdesk.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Exposure managementDiffersWith a condition

Blast radius views on the graph; Unified Vulnerability Management, announced in May 2026, deduplicates findings across tools.

Source: GlobeNewswire: JupiterOne AI system mapping and Unified Vulnerability Management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Servers and network devicesDiffersPartly

Networks are a listed asset class; network devices are not called out.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Matches

The network, including OT, is one of its three discovery systems.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Cloud workloadsPartly

Covered through integrations; cloud workloads are not named as a class on the platform page.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Partly

Cloud discovery is documented; providers are not named on the product page.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

SaaS applicationsPartly

Applications are a listed asset class.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Partly

AI usage tracking is documented; broader SaaS discovery is not.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

Identities as assetsDiffersMatches

Users are a listed asset class.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Off-network laptopsDiffersPartly

Devices are a listed asset class, through the endpoint tools you integrate.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Matches

Off-network laptops are one of its three discovery systems, through an optional agent.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

OT and IoT devicesDiffersNot in our sourcesMatches

IT, OT, cloud and IoT.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

Internet-facing discoveryNot in our sourcesNot in our sources
Offers its own agentDiffersNot in our sourcesMatches

Optional IT agent.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

Works without new agentsMatches

Builds its graph from API integrations.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Matches

Agentless scanning; passive detection runs by default.

Source: Lansweeper product · Read 27 Sep 2026

Merges records from several sourcesPartly

The graph maps relationships between assets; how duplicate records merge depends on the data each integration supplies.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Partly

Deduplicates on MAC address, serial number and hostname.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Feeds or updates a CMDBDiffersNot in our sourcesMatches

ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, HaloITSM, Freshservice and TOPdesk are shown integrations.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Cross-source queries and reportsDiffersMatches

Graph queries in plain English, a pre-built query library and compliance insights.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources
Workflows, tickets or actionsPartly

Alerts are documented; write-back actions into other systems are not.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Partly

Sends inventory to ITSM tools; actions of its own are not described.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Price or pricing basis publishedMatches

Annual list prices of $25,000, $50,000 and $100,000 by tier.

Source: JupiterOne pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Matches

Starter from €270 and Pro from €474 a month, billed annually; free up to 100 assets; Enterprise from 10,000 assets.

Source: Lansweeper pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026

Free tier or trialDiffersNot in our sourcesMatches

14 days of full access, then free up to 100 assets.

Source: Lansweeper pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026

Platform it is part ofNoneNone
Integrations

200+ pre-built security integrations.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Jira Service Management, ServiceNow, HaloITSM, Freshservice, TOPdesk, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk and Armis.

Source: Lansweeper homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Price

Published: Small-Market $25,000 a year; Mid-Market $50,000 for 12 months up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 for 12 months up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Priced on data points and term. No free tier or trial mentioned.

Source: JupiterOne pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Published, billed annually: Starter from €270 a month (2,000 assets, one installation, service desk ticket-enrichment integrations only); Pro from €474 a month (2,000 assets expandable to 9,000, up to three installations, all integrations); Enterprise custom from 10,000 assets with full API access; free up to 100 assets after a 14-day trial. Prices were shown to us in euros and may vary by location.

Source: Lansweeper pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026

Where do they differ?

  • CAASM aggregation: JupiterOne describes it; Lansweeper describes it with a condition.
  • Agent-based inventory: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper describes it.
  • CMDB-centred inventory: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper describes it with a condition.
  • Exposure management: JupiterOne describes it with a condition; Lansweeper is not in our sources.
  • Servers and network devices: JupiterOne partly matches; Lansweeper matches.
  • Identities as assets: JupiterOne matches; Lansweeper is not in our sources.
  • Off-network laptops: JupiterOne partly matches; Lansweeper matches.
  • OT and IoT devices: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper matches.
  • Offers its own agent: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper matches.
  • Feeds or updates a CMDB: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper matches.
  • Cross-source queries and reports: JupiterOne matches; Lansweeper is not in our sources.
  • Free tier or trial: JupiterOne is not in our sources; Lansweeper matches.

Can they work together?

Neither vendor's pages we read name the other as an integration. That does not mean they cannot work together; ask both vendors.

Choose JupiterOne if

  • You want to ask relationship questions across assets, users and code
  • You need a published price before a sales call

Choose Lansweeper if

  • You want to find what is on the network yourself, including OT, without going through sales first
  • You need off-network laptops covered with a light, optional agent

Which limits should you check?

JupiterOne

  • OT and IoT devices are not listed among its asset classes.
  • Write-back actions into other systems are not documented, and no free tier or trial is mentioned.

Lansweeper

  • SaaS coverage is limited to AI usage tracking on the pages we read, and identities are not described.
  • Merging what many security tools report is not described; deduplication uses MAC address, serial number and hostname.

Questions people ask

Is JupiterOne or Lansweeper better?

Neither is scored on this site. JupiterOne describes 2 of five approaches and Lansweeper 3 on the pages we read, and they differ on 12 recorded facts. Which fits depends on where your assets live, whether you can install agents, your CMDB and your tools; the finder checks those.

Do JupiterOne and Lansweeper work with a CMDB?

JupiterOne: Not in our sources. Lansweeper: Matches. ServiceNow, Jira Service Management, HaloITSM, Freshservice and TOPdesk are shown integrations.

Do JupiterOne or Lansweeper publish prices?

JupiterOne: Published: Small-Market $25,000 a year; Mid-Market $50,000 for 12 months up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 for 12 months up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Priced on data points and term. No free tier or trial mentioned. Lansweeper: Published, billed annually: Starter from €270 a month (2,000 assets, one installation, service desk ticket-enrichment integrations only); Pro from €474 a month (2,000 assets expandable to 9,000, up to three installations, all integrations); Enterprise custom from 10,000 assets with full API access; free up to 100 assets after a 14-day trial. Prices were shown to us in euros and may vary by location.

Read next

One of 45 side-by-sides. All side-by-sides