METHOD
How we match CAASM and asset inventory tools to your answers
SHORT ANSWER
We read each vendor's public pages, record what they describe for five approaches and fifteen practical checks, and apply published rules to your quiz answers. There are no scores or rankings. The same rules apply to every vendor.
By The Inventory Desk · CAASM Finder · Published 2026-10-11
Desk research from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.
What do we record for each vendor?
For each of the five approaches we record one of three statuses with a note and a source: Described (the vendor's pages we read describe it), Described with a condition (it sits in another product, a higher tier, or covers only part of the approach), and Not in our sources (we did not find it). We also record fifteen checks: servers and network devices, cloud workloads, SaaS applications, identities as assets, off-network laptops, OT and IoT devices, internet-facing discovery, an agent of its own, working without new agents, merging records from several sources, feeding or updating a CMDB, cross-source queries and reports, workflows or actions, a published price or pricing basis, and a free tier or trial. Each check is Matches, Partly or Not in our sources.
- Full bar: described on the vendor's pages we read
- Hatched bar: described with a condition (another product, a higher tier, or part of the approach)
- Stub: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
How does the finder weigh the approaches?
| Question | Answer | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Where do your assets live? | Servers and network gear in offices or data centres | AGENT +2, CMDB +1 |
| Where do your assets live? | Cloud workloads in AWS, Azure or Google Cloud | CAASM +2 |
| Where do your assets live? | SaaS applications and the identities that use them | CAASM +3 |
| Where do your assets live? | Laptops that rarely touch the office network | AGENT +2 |
| Where do your assets live? | OT, IoT or medical devices | AGENT +2 |
| Where do your assets live? | Internet-facing systems nobody has listed | EASM +5 |
| Can you install agents on your devices? | Yes, on most devices | AGENT +3 |
| Can you install agents on your devices? | On some devices only | AGENT +1, CAASM +1 |
| Can you install agents on your devices? | No new agents: policy, a change freeze or fragile devices | CAASM +2 |
| What state is your CMDB in? | We do not have one | CMDB +2, AGENT +1 |
| What state is your CMDB in? | We have one, but people do not trust it | CAASM +3, CMDB +1 |
| What state is your CMDB in? | It works, and IT workflows depend on it | CMDB +4 |
| How many teams own assets? | One team runs IT and security assets | AGENT +1 |
| How many teams own assets? | Two to four teams, for example IT, security and cloud | CAASM +1, EXPO +1 |
| How many teams own assets? | Many teams or business units, and owners are often unknown | CAASM +1, EXPO +2 |
| How much compliance pressure do you face? | Little formal pressure today | Nothing |
| How much compliance pressure do you face? | Periodic audits that ask for asset evidence | CMDB +2 |
| How much compliance pressure do you face? | Regulators or customers expect evidence of control coverage at any time | EXPO +3 |
| What do you already run? | A handful of tools, no central platform | AGENT +2 |
| What do you already run? | Many tools (EDR, MDM, identity, cloud, scanners) that disagree with each other | CAASM +3 |
| What do you already run? | ServiceNow | CMDB +3 |
| What do you already run? | Tenable | EXPO +4 |
| What do you already run? | Rapid7 | EXPO +3, EASM +1 |
| What do you already run? | Microsoft (Azure, Intune, Entra ID or Sentinel) | EASM +2, CAASM +1 |
Every approach starts at 0 points, and each answer adds the points in the table. Approaches are then ordered by points, highest first; ties keep the fixed order CAASM, AGENT, EASM, CMDB, EXPO.
The first approach is Start here. Each of the next two is Also relevant if its points are at least 3 and at least half the points of the first approach. Approaches with 0 points are Not suggested by your answers; the rest are Lower on your list.
How does the finder check vendors?
Each vendor gets points for the approaches picked for you (Start here and Also relevant): 2 for Described, 1 for Described with a condition, 0 for Not in our sources. It then gets points for each check your answers trigger, counted once even if several answers trigger it, and platform points when your answer to question 06 is a platform.
| Check | When it applies | Matches | Partly | Not in our sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servers and network devices | Where do your assets live? Servers and network gear in offices or data centres | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Cloud workloads | Where do your assets live? Cloud workloads in AWS, Azure or Google Cloud | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| SaaS applications | Where do your assets live? SaaS applications and the identities that use them | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Identities as assets | Where do your assets live? SaaS applications and the identities that use them | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Off-network laptops | Where do your assets live? Laptops that rarely touch the office network | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| OT and IoT devices | Where do your assets live? OT, IoT or medical devices | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Internet-facing discovery | Where do your assets live? Internet-facing systems nobody has listed | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Offers its own agent | Can you install agents on your devices? Yes, on most devices | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Works without new agents | Can you install agents on your devices? On some devices only; Can you install agents on your devices? No new agents: policy, a change freeze or fragile devices | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Merges records from several sources | What state is your CMDB in? We have one, but people do not trust it; How many teams own assets? Two to four teams, for example IT, security and cloud; What do you already run? Many tools (EDR, MDM, identity, cloud, scanners) that disagree with each other | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Feeds or updates a CMDB | What state is your CMDB in? We have one, but people do not trust it; What state is your CMDB in? It works, and IT workflows depend on it | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Price or pricing basis published | How many teams own assets? One team runs IT and security assets | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Free tier or trial | How many teams own assets? One team runs IT and security assets | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Workflows, tickets or actions | How many teams own assets? Many teams or business units, and owners are often unknown; How much compliance pressure do you face? Regulators or customers expect evidence of control coverage at any time | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Cross-source queries and reports | How much compliance pressure do you face? Periodic audits that ask for asset evidence; How much compliance pressure do you face? Regulators or customers expect evidence of control coverage at any time | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Is the platform you already run | Question 06 answered ServiceNow, Tenable, Rapid7 or Microsoft, and the vendor is that platform | +4 | ||
| Connects to the platform you run | Question 06 answered ServiceNow, Tenable, Rapid7 or Microsoft, and the vendor's pages name a connection to it | +2 | ||
Vendors with the same total are shown as equals and listed alphabetically. We never show the total as a score.
What does Not in our sources mean, and is it fair?
It means we did not find the item on the pages we read. It counts zero, not against the vendor. It does affect order: a vendor whose pages name a Tenable integration can match a Tenable shop, and one whose pages do not cannot, even if the integration exists. This cuts against vendors with long integration catalogues that we did not reproduce in full, Axonius among them: its adapter directory lists 1,306 adapters, and we recorded only those with documentation we read. The fix is a source, not a guess: send it through the contact page and we will add it.
Which vendors are covered, and why these ten?
Ten platforms whose products answer the question of what you own, from five directions, with public pages detailed enough to record: Armis Centrix, Axonius, Censys ASM, JupiterOne, Lansweeper, Microsoft Defender EASM, Qualys CSAM, Rapid7 Surface Command, runZero and Tenable One. ServiceNow, Freshservice and Device42 are covered as the CMDB and service desk systems these platforms work alongside, not matched as options. Oomnitza is relevant but not covered: its pages describe IT asset lifecycle management more than security coverage. We will add vendors as our sources grow.
Where do the facts come from?
- Vendor product pages, documentation, pricing pages, marketplace listings, press releases and blog posts, read on 27 September 2026, with pricing, adapter, deployment and trial pages for several vendors read again on 11 October 2026. Each fact on the site carries its source link and its own read date.
- Prices from AWS Marketplace listings are labelled as marketplace prices; they are list prices for a stated contract, and private offers may differ.
- Vendor figures such as asset counts, adapter counts or customer numbers are quoted as the vendor's statement and are never our finding.
- Where a vendor does not publish a price, we write Not published.
- Definitions of CVE, CVSS, EPSS and the CISA KEV catalog link to the public pages of FIRST and CISA, and references to NIST link to NIST's own pages.
What are the limitations?
Public sources only. No hands-on testing, no demos, no vendor interviews. A vendor's pages describe what it sells, not how well it works on your estate, and integration catalogues are longer than the examples we recorded. That is why the Not in our sources status exists. Use the finder to decide what to ask and what to put into a proof of concept, not as a test result.
Do the same rules apply to every vendor?
Yes. The same rules apply to every vendor, they are published on this page, and vendors with equal fit are listed alphabetically. With other answers, other vendors come first: a ServiceNow shop with a working CMDB is pointed to Lansweeper and runZero as equals, a small IT team that can install agents to Lansweeper, an Azure team worried about what faces the internet to Microsoft Defender EASM, a Rapid7 shop to Rapid7 Surface Command, a Tenable shop to Tenable One, and the example mixed estate to runZero.
How do we handle corrections?
Send a correction through the contact page with the topic Correction and a public source. We check it against the vendor's page and update the data; finder results recompute automatically.
Questions people ask
Did you test these products?
No. Every fact comes from public vendor pages read on 27 September and 11 October 2026.
Can a vendor pay to appear first?
No. Order comes only from the published rules and your answers.
Why no scores?
Because the right approach depends on the estate more than on any single number. A score would hide the constraint that matters to you, such as a CMDB your workflows depend on or devices that cannot take an agent.
Read next
- CAASM finder
Apply the rules to your own answers.
- The five approaches
What each approach does, and where it stops.
- Platform notes
Every recorded fact, vendor by vendor.
- Asset census
Put two to five vendors' facts side by side.